Normalization Details

Most extinction curves in this package are normalized to A(V). This reflects that the most useful normalization is to an absolute measure of the dust column. Extinction curves have often also been normalized to E(B-V), mainly as historically B and V photometry was available for the stars used to measure extinction and the color excess between these two bands provided a (relative) measure of the dust column. With the availability of JHK photometry (especially after the 2MASS survey), it was possible to measure R(V) = A(V)/E(B-V) and covert the curves to to the absolute normalization of A(V).

A(V) and E(B-V) normalization Subtleties

With the advent of using dust extinction curves to account for the effects of dust extinction on stellar spectroscopy, the details of the wavelengths assumed for the V and B band for normalized dust extinction curves is been of interest.

The majority of dust extinction curves are measured using optical photometry and the wavelengths assumed for specific bands influence the application of dust extinction curves for spectroscopic observations.

Simple measurements reveal that different authors have assumed different wavelengths for the V and B bands. Other details in the construction of the extinction curves can also impact the effective wavelengths of the V and B bands (e.g., optical extinction shape in absence of V or B band photomtery). The table below gives the wavelengths of the V and B bands by determining where the A(lambda)/A(V) extinction curves have values of 1 (V band) and 1 + 1/R(V) (B band). The R(V) values are the average R(V) for the average models and R(V) = 3.1 for the parameters averages and the grain models.

To obtain the “correct” R(V) values using monochromatic wavelengths, the B and V wavelengths in the tables below need to be used.

Only models that are defined at V and B wavelengths are given in these tables.

Average Models

Model

A(lambda)/A(V) = 1

A(lambda)/A(V) = 1 + 1/R(V)

R(V)

[micron]

[micron]

B92_MWAvg

0.5500

0.4400

3.10

G03_SMCBar

0.5500

0.4422

2.74

G03_LMCAvg

0.5500

0.4399

3.41

G03_LMC2

0.5500

0.4369

2.76

GCC09_MWAvg

0.5528

0.4238

3.10

G24_SMCAvg

0.5530

0.4440

3.02

G24_SMCBumps

0.5500

0.4400

2.55

C25_M31Avg

0.5409

0.4430

3.20

G26_M33Avg

0.5358

0.4272

4.66

Parameter Average Models

The values given below were calculated assuming R(V) = 3.1, but will be the same for any R(V). The exception is for F19 where the normalization is to A(55), so so R(55) = 3.1 was assumed. The A(55) values give the monochromatic value at 0.5500 micron while the A(V) values give the value averaged over the V band.

Model

A(lambda)/A(V) = 1

A(lambda)/A(V) = 1 + 1/R(V)

R(V)

[micron]

[micron]

CCM89

0.5495

0.4405

3.10

O94

0.5495

0.4399

3.10

F99

0.5414

0.4354

3.10

F04

0.5414

0.4352

3.10

M14

0.5495

0.4405

3.10

F19

0.5501

0.4399

3.10

G23

0.5494

0.4392

3.10

G16

0.5414

0.4354

3.10

Grain Models

Model

A(lambda)/A(V) = 1

A(lambda)/A(V) = 1 + 1/R(V)

R(V)

[micron]

[micron]

DBP90

0.5512

0.4456

3.10

WD01

0.5495

0.4422

3.10

D03

0.5495

0.4393

3.10

ZDA04

0.5517

0.4456

3.10

C11

0.5511

0.4213

3.10

J13

0.5512

0.4336

3.10

HD23

0.5497

0.4406

3.10

Y24

0.5511

0.4416

3.10

P24

0.5505

0.4223

3.10

G23 Renormalization

The G23 R(V) dependent average model requires a small, but significant renormalization due to the specific observations that were used.

This model was constructed from 4 different literature samples (GCC09, F19, G21, & D22), with only F19 having optical spectroscopy in addition to V photometry. To have consistent values for all 4 samples, the R(V) values were derived for the F19 using the observed V and JHK photometry. After publication, it was found (M. Fouseneau 2025, private comm) that the G23 curves for different R(V) values intersected at A(lambda)/A(V) = 0.9854 at lambda = 0.5493 micron. All the other R(V) dependent average models intersect at A(lambda)/A(V) = 1 for different R(V) values. This is a result of using the observed V band photometry to measure R(V) and the optical spectroscopy for the A(lambda)/A(V) measurements. This indicates that the observed V band photometry for the F19 sample is offset from the optical spectroscopy by 1.5%. As the optical spectroscopy is from the Hubble Space Telescope with the STIS spectrograph and the V band photometry is from ground-based measurements, the optical spectroscopy will be more accurate.

The flux calibration offset between the V photometry and spectroscopy matters as the F19 work used stellar atmosphere models for the unreddened comparison stars. Thus, this work is sensitive to the absolute flux calibration of the different observations and this has changed over the years (e.g., Bohlin 2014, AJ, 147, 127). This is in contrast to the other three works that used observed unreddened stars and, thus, are only sensitivity to the relative calibration of the instruments used.

Thus, the G23 model has been renormalized by dividing by 0.9854. In hindsight, G23 should have derived V band fluxes from the optical spectroscopy instead of using observed V photometry.

Computation Details

The wavelengths given in the above tables are computed using utils/determine_norm_wavelength.py.